🚚 on the house SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.7/5 from 819+ reviews
Vintageβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

Vintage Celine Macadam Clutch

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.7 out of 5(819 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$450
$750
Sale
βœ“ on the house dispatch on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Condition: favor recent! Can be used as a clutch or cosmetic bag

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
express shipment
↩️
easy-to-use Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Vintage Celine Macadam Clutch

Condition: fancy recent!

Can be used as a clutch or cosmetic bag​

This product is flawless for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 2030806

Category: Vintage > Bags & Purses > Clutches

Original Price:$750 USD

Sale Price:$450 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand recent

🚚 fulfillment & Returns

βœ“ no-cost fulfillment on orders over $50

Standard dispatch: 3-5 business days

Express shipping: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.7
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 7910 reviews

DC
Daniel Clark βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago Β· Phoenix, AZ
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
impeccable in every way
From my experience, the Vintage Celine Macadam Clutch works as described so no complaints.
3 people found this helpful
JB
Justin Baker βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago Β· Memphis, TN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
fantastic Vintage Celine Macadam Clutch
For the price, the Vintage Celine Macadam Clutch works fine so it’s acceptable.
21 people found this helpful
AR
Aaron Roberts βœ“ Verified Purchase​
4 months ago Β· Dallas, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
fantastic investment
really good value for this Vintage Celine Macadam Clutch.
45 people found this helpful
AW
Ashley White βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 year ago Β· Dallas, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
definitely impressed
Good build and finish Vintage Celine Macadam Clutch.
21 people found this helpful
MW
Michelle Walker βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· Honolulu, HI
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Fantastic product
So far, it is practical which feels reasonable.
4 people found this helpful